Administration faces backlash over River Park
October 3, 2021
Members of Save Weddington placed signs along Coldwater Canyon Avenue to protest the school’s River Park plan. The organization, whose goal is to preserve Weddington Golf & Tennis, posted signs to coincide with increased activity on campus during Homecoming on Oct. 2.
Save Weddington Board Member Teri Austin said the organization acted in anticipation of Homecoming because they feel many families in the school community do not fully understand the school’s proposal. They used the event as an opportunity to communicate their message.
“It has been very difficult for us to communicate with the families and students of Harvard-Westlake in order to explain our position on the proposed development,” Austin said. “The opportunity to have several hundred people see the signs and inquire about them [would] give us an opportunity to be able to interface with the community. As I understand, about 3% of the students who go to the school actually live in Studio City. We [normally] don’t have access to a lot of these people.”
The signs include a link to Save LA River Open Space, a sister organization of the Studio City Residents Association, and read, “It’s not a done deal!” According to Austin, this means the school must finish the conditional use permit application process and perform more community outreach before breaking ground on the project.
“What Harvard-Westlake needs to do is prove to the city that this is a benefit to the community, [the] 13,600 who signed our petition and [the] over 1,000 individual [letter-writers] to the Department of Planning so far,” Austin said. “These are from residents of not just [Studio City], but Sherman Oaks and Panorama City.”
Grace Hudson ’23, a Studio City resident who owns an anti-River Park sign, said most of her neighbors support Save Weddington’s campaign and are hesitant about the project.
“The signs are very representative of what my neighborhood and surrounding neighborhoods feel,” Hudson said. “From what I’ve heard, people don’t want an Olympic-sized swimming pool next to their house.”
Studio City Residents Association President Alan Dymond said the River Park proposal would uproot the lives of many long-term residents and eliminate a largely popular recreational opportunity for those living in the San Fernando Valley.
“Concerns are being raised across the valley because a lot of people, [especially] a lot of elderly people, go [to Weddington] and play golf,” Dymond said. “What [the school is] trying to do is take away a facility [that] people have used it for over 50 years. After [President] Rick Commons [said] that they won’t do anything to disturb the peace and tranquility, it has just grown and grown and grown from there. And what we’re looking at right now, it’s too much to me.”
Head of Communications and Strategic Initiatives Ari Engelberg ’89 declined to comment.
Richard Leivenberg • Nov 9, 2021 at 6:08 pm
An Open Letter to the Students at Harvard Westlake:
Dear Students: I wonder how aware you are of your school’s plan to tear down Weddington Golf and Tennis on Whitsett in Studio City. The school purchased the property for $46 million and plans on replacing the golf course, driving range and many of the tennis courts with a variety of sports facilities that will make your lives easier.
Are you aware that there are thousands of Studio City, SF Valley and LA residents who are up in arms about this development?
You see, for over 60 years, Weddington has been the common ground for us to gather, recreate, take in the tree-lined scenery, meet friends, teach children and grandchildren golf and tennis and generally have a good time within our community. Not to mention the plan will decimate the natural environment of the area.
The new development will displace us and take away from us a very important part of our lives.
I wonder what kind of lesson the HW powers-that-be are teaching you, their students, about how to treat your neighbors. What are they teaching you about how to treat our environment as we all struggle to deal with the rapidly encroaching changes in climate? What are they teaching you about community and cooperation and about the intrinsic values of an open gathering space?
When asked why HW needed an expanded sports facility at one of the public meetings, one of the spokespeople said, “Our children are getting home late for dinner and we need to provide them with more playing space.”
This seems like a very weak argument, one that puts the students in the spotlight when it is obviously a way for HW to expand its largesse at the expense of the neighborhood.
If you know math, as I am sure you do, this is pure subtraction with no value to those who live nearby and frequent this recreation area.
Consider this: If the space meant nothing to us, if we didn’t care one bit about HW’s development, why would we be so up in arms about it? Have you seen the billboards and lawn signs in the neighborhood? Have you seen the video decrying this effort? Have you visited the website (www.saveweddington.org) where thousands have signed a petition to stop the destruction of this beloved community asset?
As students you have a right to know what is going on. I entreat you to speak with your administrators and your parents about what is planned at Weddington. This is not a good public relations move for Harvard Westlake and I imagine many of your friends who do not attend your school will not be happy with it.
In the name of what is good, what is environmentally correct and what is more beneficial to all involved, please support the fight against Harvard Westlake’s development plans.
Richard Leivenberg
http://www.saveweddington.org